NPR’s Don Gonyea speaks with researcher Vanda Felbab-Brown about why she thinks President Trump’s proposed tariffs and designating cartels as terrorist organizations will not cease the opioid disaster.
DON GONYEA, HOST:
On the subject of preventing opioids, designating drug cartels as international terrorist organizations does much more hurt than good. That is in accordance with Vanda Felbab-Brown of the Brookings Establishment. She directs the suppose tanks program on the fentanyl epidemic in North America and is an knowledgeable on worldwide organized crime. In a current essay in Overseas Affairs, she argues that terrorism designations and tariffs, each central to President Trump’s plan to gradual the move of opioids, could be disastrous. However she additionally says that threatening using such strategies could possibly be helpful. Vanda Felbab-Brown joins me now. Welcome.
VANDA FELBAB-BROWN: Thanks, Don. It is a pleasure to be with you on the present.
GONYEA: You write in regards to the two instruments the Trump administration is utilizing to cope with illicit opioids coming into the U.S., tariffs and designating cartels as these international terrorist organizations. Briefly, are you able to clarify your No. 1 concern with every method? Let’s begin with the tariffs.
FELBAB-BROWN: Completely. So the Trump administration actually moved U.S. drug coverage into completely new domains when it linked it to tariffs and utilized very huge tariffs to U.S. neighbors and core U.S. ally Canada, in addition to to Mexico and to China. And the danger, after all, is that the tariffs can have a adverse financial penalties for every of the nation, together with america themselves. On the identical time, if the tariffs aren’t eliminated, if there may be compliance with the counternarcotics calls for that the Trump administration has issued, they turn out to be meaningless. They only harm the economic system.
GONYEA: After which let us take a look at the opposite piece of that, using the international terrorist group designation. What’s your concern there?
FELBAB-BROWN: Properly, the issue with FTO – the FTO designation is that it actually doesn’t present many expansive legislation enforcement instruments that aren’t there within the first place, however it comes with very expansive, intensive and obscure materials help clauses. These are materials help clauses that state by U.S. legal guidelines that any sort of materials help, as little as a cup of water will be prosecuted underneath U.S. legal guidelines. And there are some exceptions to U.S., however they do not all the time maintain up in U.S. courts and, for that matter, in worldwide courts.
GONYEA: Simply to underscore that time concerning the terrorist group designation, it sounds such as you’re saying, too, it could be dangerous as a result of cartels are sometimes really concerned with a big selection of authorized companies. What is the subject there?
FELBAB-BROWN: Completely. So nowadays, drug trafficking organizations don’t solely site visitors in medication or, for that matter, aren’t solely engaged in unlawful actions. Actually in Mexico, they’ve reached unprecedented degree of energy. And extortion of authorized financial actions is a standard day prevalence by nearly all the legal actors in Mexico. And worse than that, the Mexican cartels are even instantly making an attempt to take over elements of authorized economies. That is true in agriculture, in fisheries, in mining, every kind of extractives – in trucking. They not simply extort the businesses. They, actually, owe elements of the enterprises. Now, that is very dangerous. It is dangerous for Mexico, and it is definitely dangerous for america, and making a concerted effort to roll again their exercise from authorized economies is essential.
GONYEA: To place it within the easiest phrases doable, an above-the-board, to illustrate, an American firm could also be doing enterprise with a enterprise they suppose is authorized however has some ties to the cartel someplace, and that will put that preliminary firm, that American firm, in danger.
FELBAB-BROWN: Completely. So the fabric help clauses require knowingly offering materials help. However U.S. actors, whether or not people or firms, are required to do due diligence. And so there may be solely a lot leeway that they’ll argue that they didn’t know that their counterpart with whom they dealt in Mexico was paying, for instance, extortion charges or had elements of the enterprise infiltrated by the cartels.
GONYEA: Historically, diplomacy and legislation enforcement cooperation have been the norm in coping with this subject. Actually, there are individuals who say, why not do that completely different method? How do you reply to that sort of an announcement?
FELBAB-BROWN: Properly, the problem of making an attempt one thing that’s so disruptive to relations is that it’s tough to unwind. So you’ll be able to apply tariffs, and you’ll finally again away from them as a result of the opposite nation applies countertariffs. And that is certainly a scenario the place we’re with China. President Trump additionally issued a ten% fentanyl-linked tariff on China. China didn’t budge, didn’t provide extra intensive legislation enforcement help thus far. As a substitute, it utilized countertariffs at 15%. And so finally we are going to possible see bargaining between the 2 nations that may effectively end result within the suspension and weakening of the counternarcotics cooperation that did happen in 2024 after an extended, several-year pause. And we will likely be type of again at at the place to begin, at line zero, in restarting cooperation, and now we have wasted time.
GONYEA: That was Vanda Felbab-Brown of the Brookings Establishment. You’ll be able to learn her piece, “The New Conflict On Medicine,” in Overseas Affairs. Thanks a lot for becoming a member of us.
FELBAB-BROWN: Thanks for having me.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content is probably not in its last kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might fluctuate. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.
