In October 2024, we performed an in depth survey to grasp runners’ preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction with numerous operating shoe manufacturers. The survey gathered responses from 794 runners, offering helpful insights into operating shoe preferences and the way totally different manufacturers are perceived by their customers.
With this pattern dimension, at a 95% confidence degree, our survey findings have a margin of error of roughly ±3.5%. Whereas this means robust statistical significance, it’s essential to notice that these findings characterize the views and behaviors of our survey respondents and will not be absolutely consultant of the general operating shoe market.
You’re free to make use of this knowledge in your personal articles, so long as you credit score us by linking again to our web site. If you need entry to the uncooked knowledge file, please electronic mail guru(at)runningshoesguru.com
Introduction
This evaluation explores six key points of runners’ relationships with operating shoe manufacturers:
- Model Consideration: Which manufacturers runners take into account when purchasing for sneakers
- Buy Habits: How consideration interprets into precise shopping for choices
- Favourite Manufacturers: Which manufacturers runners choose and why
- Essential Elements: What drives model desire amongst runners
- Satisfaction Ranges: How glad runners are with their chosen manufacturers
- Future Buy Intentions: Which manufacturers runners plan to purchase subsequent
Model Consideration: Which model have you ever thought-about shopping for prior to now 12 months?
The operating shoe market reveals clear stratification by way of model consideration amongst runners.
Conventional running-focused manufacturers dominate the highest tier, with Asics (467) and Saucony (444) being thought-about by considerably extra runners than different manufacturers.
These specialist operating manufacturers are adopted by a robust center tier consisting of New Stability (360), Hoka (359), and Brooks (341), every being thought-about by roughly comparable numbers of runners.
Apparently, world athletic put on giants Nike (292) and Adidas (285) sit in a lower-middle tier, suggesting that regardless of their huge presence basically sportswear, they aren’t the go-to selections for devoted runners.
The consideration set is rounded out by Puma (176), Mizuno (125), and On (119), although it’s price noting that Puma’s comparatively stronger place would possibly mirror their current push into the efficiency operating market.
The outcomes recommend that runners are likely to favor manufacturers with deep operating heritage and specialised operating experience over normal athletic manufacturers, with conventional running-focused manufacturers commanding nearly all of runner consideration.
Buy Behaviour: How consideration interprets into precise shopping for choices
precise purchases prior to now 12 months, Saucony (300) and Asics (292) keep their management place from the consideration part, creating a transparent prime tier considerably forward of their rivals.
A stable center tier emerges with Nike, New Stability, Hoka, and Brooks all clustered very carefully collectively (181-183 purchases), adopted by Adidas (171).
The underside tier includes Puma (92), whereas Mizuno (54) and On (45) lag considerably behind – although this may occasionally mirror their smaller market presence or extra specialised positioning within the operating shoe market.
The conversion fee signifies what proportion of runners who thought-about a model went on to make a purchase order from that model prior to now 12 months. That is calculated by dividing the variety of purchases by the variety of concerns for every model, giving us perception into how successfully manufacturers convert curiosity into gross sales.
Saucony emerges because the clear chief, changing 67.6% of concerns into purchases, adopted carefully by Nike (62.7%) and Asics (62.5%) – an attention-grabbing mixture of specialist operating and normal athletic manufacturers.
A definite center tier in conversion effectiveness contains Adidas (60%), Brooks (53.1%), and Puma (52.3%), whereas New Stability and Hoka hover across the 50% mark regardless of their robust consideration numbers.
Most notably, this knowledge challenges the narrative from the consideration numbers – whereas conventional operating manufacturers dominated consideration, the conversion charges present world athletic manufacturers Nike and Adidas performing remarkably effectively at changing curiosity into gross sales.
On the decrease finish, Mizuno (43.2%) and significantly On (37.8%) present considerably decrease conversion charges, suggesting potential limitations between curiosity and buy for these manufacturers – presumably associated to components corresponding to pricing, availability, or the necessity to attempt these manufacturers in individual earlier than buy.
This conversion evaluation paints a unique image from the pure consideration knowledge, suggesting that whereas specialised operating manufacturers would possibly seize preliminary curiosity extra successfully, each specialist and main athletic manufacturers will be equally efficient at changing that curiosity into gross sales.
This might point out that components past pure operating heritage – corresponding to pricing technique, distribution networks, or advertising and marketing effectiveness – play essential roles within the closing buy resolution.
Favourite manufacturers: Which manufacturers runners choose and why
When runners have been requested to pick out their single favourite model, Saucony (192) emerges because the clear chief, considerably forward of second-place Asics (142). A definite center tier types with Brooks (97), Nike (95), and Hoka (91) clustered carefully collectively, adopted by New Stability (66) and Adidas (60). The underside tier consists of Puma (26), Mizuno (18), and On (7), exhibiting a big drop-off from the upper tiers.
Wanting on the development from consideration to favourite model offers fascinating insights into model loyalty and desire power. Saucony reveals exceptional effectiveness in changing each consideration (43.2% of those that thought-about Saucony named it their favourite) and purchases (64.0% of purchasers take into account it their favourite) into model desire. Equally, Nike and Brooks present robust skill to transform purchasers into loyal followers, with 51.9% and 53.6% of their purchasers respectively naming them as favourite manufacturers. In distinction, manufacturers like On (15.6% of purchasers identify it favourite) and Puma (28.3%) wrestle to transform even their prospects into model advocates.
This development evaluation reveals that whereas some manufacturers could also be extensively thought-about or bought, their skill to develop into a runner’s favourite varies dramatically. The information means that sure manufacturers, significantly Saucony, have discovered a candy spot in not simply attracting consideration however in delivering an expertise that converts runners into model advocates. In the meantime, the comparatively low conversion charges for some manufacturers would possibly point out both a job as a complementary reasonably than main operating shoe, or potential gaps between expectations and expertise.
Essential Elements: What drives model desire amongst runners
When analyzing the components that drive model desire amongst runners, two components clearly dominate: Consolation (346) and Efficiency (333), collectively accounting for about 85% of all responses. There may be then a big drop to a second tier consisting of Sturdiness (48) and Worth (28), adopted by a 3rd tier of Fashion/Design (17), Model Repute (12), and Availability (10).
how these components differ by model reveals attention-grabbing patterns. Brooks (56.7%), Hoka (67.0%), and New Stability (59.1%) are predominantly chosen for Consolation, whereas Saucony (52.6%), Puma (61.5%), and Adidas (48.3%) are primarily chosen for Efficiency. Asics reveals a extra balanced profile between Efficiency (43.0%) and Consolation (41.5%). Apparently, Nike stands out with a good portion of runners (9.5%) citing Fashion/Design as their main purpose for desire – the very best amongst all manufacturers for this issue.
These findings recommend that whereas runners primarily make their model selections primarily based on purposeful points (Consolation and Efficiency), totally different manufacturers have efficiently positioned themselves alongside these axes in distinct methods. The information additionally reveals that components usually emphasised in advertising and marketing, corresponding to type and model fame, play a surprisingly minor position in runners’ model preferences, with sensible concerns clearly dominating the decision-making course of.
Satisfaction Ranges: How glad runners are with their chosen manufacturers
The satisfaction survey reveals overwhelmingly optimistic suggestions throughout all manufacturers, with a formidable total satisfaction rating of 4.45 out of 5. The distribution is closely skewed towards excessive satisfaction, with 93.8% of respondents ranking their sneakers both 4 or 5 stars. Extra particularly, 51.5% gave a 5-star ranking and 42.3% gave a 4-star ranking, whereas solely 6.2% rated their sneakers 3 stars or under.
particular person manufacturers, satisfaction scores vary from 4.17 to 4.57, exhibiting constantly excessive satisfaction throughout the board. Whereas On leads with a 4.57 common, its small pattern dimension (n=7) makes this discovering much less dependable. Amongst manufacturers with substantial pattern sizes, Hoka and Brooks share the highest place (each 4.53), adopted carefully by Puma (4.50), Asics and Saucony (each 4.49). Notably, even the lowest-rated manufacturers – Nike (4.31) and Adidas (4.17) – keep very optimistic scores above 4 stars, although they do present a barely larger proportion of 3-star scores in comparison with different manufacturers.
These remarkably excessive satisfaction scores throughout all manufacturers recommend that operating shoe producers are typically assembly or exceeding runner expectations. The minimal variation between manufacturers (a variety of simply 0.4 between the very best and lowest scores amongst main manufacturers) signifies that whereas runners might have robust model preferences, the precise expertise with their chosen model tends to be constantly optimistic.
Future Buy Intentions: Which manufacturers runners plan to purchase subsequent
The chart compares the variety of runners who at the moment favor a model with those that plan to purchase it subsequent, proven as a proportion change. For example, a +47% for New Stability signifies that 47% extra runners plan to purchase New Stability subsequent in comparison with those that at the moment take into account it their favourite model (from 66 present followers to 97 future consumers).
future buy intentions reveals some important shifts within the operating shoe market. Two distinct teams emerge: manufacturers gaining momentum and types experiencing decline. On reveals probably the most dramatic enhance, with practically 4 instances as many runners planning to purchase it in comparison with present favorites (+285.7%, from 7 to 27 runners). New Stability additionally reveals robust momentum with 47% extra future consumers than present favorites (+31 runners), adopted by Puma with a 61.5% enhance (+16 runners). On the opposite finish, Saucony reveals probably the most important decline, with 33.9% fewer future buy intentions than present favorites (-65 runners), whereas Nike additionally sees a notable 25.3% lower (-24 runners).
The center of the market reveals attention-grabbing stability, with Brooks, Hoka, and Asics sustaining practically equal numbers between present favorites and future purchases (variations below 10%). This implies these manufacturers have discovered a secure market place, neither gaining important new converts nor shedding present supporters in giant numbers.
These patterns may point out a market in transition, with runners exhibiting elevated curiosity in manufacturers that is likely to be seen as challengers to conventional market leaders. The robust exhibiting from On, New Stability, and Puma, mixed with the decline in Saucony and Nike buy intentions, would possibly mirror altering preferences within the operating neighborhood or profitable innovation and advertising and marketing from the ascending manufacturers.
Some closing observations
Wanting throughout all points of this operating shoe market evaluation, a number of key patterns emerge that paint an image of a dynamic and evolving market. The evaluation reveals each the power of conventional manufacturers and the emergence of thrilling challengers, suggesting an business in transition.
Market Dynamics
- Conventional operating manufacturers (Asics, Saucony) dominate preliminary model consideration
- Nevertheless, excessive consideration doesn’t routinely translate to purchases or loyalty
- Excessive total satisfaction (4.45/5.0 common) throughout all manufacturers
- Market reveals important fluidity in future buy intentions
The information reveals an attention-grabbing rigidity between specialist operating manufacturers and normal athletic manufacturers. Whereas operating specialists excel at getting into the consideration set, world athletic giants like Nike and Adidas present exceptional effectivity in changing consideration to buy. This challenges the notion that critical runners routinely choose specialist manufacturers.
Rising Challengers & Future Implications
- On and Puma present exceptional momentum in future buy intentions
- On demonstrates probably the most dramatic progress from present favorites to future intentions
- New Stability gaining important floor in future buy plans
- Excessive satisfaction throughout manufacturers allows simpler model switching
- Extra numerous and aggressive market prone to emerge
- Established leaders might want to work tougher to take care of their positions
These patterns level to an business the place established leaders can’t relaxation on their laurels.
Whereas conventional operating manufacturers keep robust positions, the excessive satisfaction scores throughout all manufacturers mixed with important variation in future buy intentions point out that runners are more and more prepared to experiment. The operating shoe market of tomorrow might look fairly totally different from at the moment’s.
Wish to use this knowledge in your personal analysis? Ship us an electronic mail at guru(at)runningshoesguru.com!
