Of all of the methods that in the present day’s plutocrats spend their billions, founding an artwork museum is among the extra benign, someplace behind eradicating malaria however forward of eradicating democracy. The artwork in these museums is sort of at all times modern, reflecting the dearth of accessible outdated masters together with a world chattering-classes consensus that avant-garde artwork is socially, intellectually, and culturally essential. Few of those tycoons, although, are prone to discover the stakes as agonizingly excessive as Albert C. Barnes did.
Discover the April 2025 Concern
Try extra from this difficulty and discover your subsequent story to learn.
From 1912 to 1951, Barnes amassed one of many world’s biggest non-public collections of contemporary European paintings—extra Cézannes (69) and Renoirs (an absurd 181) than some other museum; Matisse’s game-changing The Pleasure of Life ; Seurat’s extraordinary Fashions ; the checklist goes on and on. The Barnes Basis was formally an academic establishment, however was successfully America’s first museum of contemporary artwork. (The New York group that put capital letters on these phrases is 4 years youthful.) But when Barnes’s assortment is a mannequin to emulate, the saga of his group is a lesson in founder’s-syndrome perils.
Coinciding with the centennial of the Barnes’s opening, we’ve Blake Gopnik’s breezy new biography of the person, The Maverick’s Museum, and Neil L. Rudenstine’s reissued historical past of the establishment, The Home of Barnes, first revealed in 2012, when its authorized struggles had been above-the-fold information. The 2 need to be learn collectively, as a result of the slippage of id between the person, the artwork, and the establishment gives each the melodrama and the farce of the story.
Born into ungenteel poverty in 1872, Barnes was good sufficient to achieve admission to Philadelphia’s selective Central Excessive Faculty and the College of Pennsylvania’s medical college. Realizing, maybe, that he lacked one thing within the bedside-manner division, he went into chemical analysis, and in 1902 he and his accomplice commercially launched the antiseptic Argyrol, which turned customary in American maternity wards for the prevention of perinatal infections. As a chemist, Barnes was a one-hit surprise, however Argyrol made him a fortune.
At first he used his new cash in predictable methods. He constructed a mansion on the Fundamental Line and named it “Lauraston” for his spouse. He purchased quick automobiles (a ardour that may be the loss of life of him) and joined the native fox hunt. He additionally did much less clichéd issues, akin to finding out philosophy, studying Sigmund Freud, and supporting civil rights. A fan of the pragmatist thinkers William James and John Dewey, Barnes believed {that a} principle’s price was measured not by its class however by its penalties on the planet, and he handled his Argyrol manufacturing facility as a laboratory for social experimentation. He employed Black and white employees, women and men. Contra then-flourishing notions of top-down, rigidly mandated office “effectivity,” Barnes boasted that in his manufacturing facility, “every participant had advanced his or her personal technique of doing a selected job.” The “her” in that sentence alone is noteworthy.
By Blake Gopnik
On the identical time, Barnes was a crank of operatic grandiosity—thin-skinned, bellicose, distrustful, fickle, and vindictive. Ezra Pound described him as dwelling in “a state of high-tension hysteria, at battle with mankind.” His bile may very well be witty, however extra usually traded on playground scatology, ethnic slurs, and sexual taunts. The Philadelphia Museum of Artwork was “a home of inventive and academic prostitution”; when a newspaper critic took offense at “the fevered ardour for unclean issues!” (bare folks) in Barnes’s assortment, he despatched a letter impugning her “well-recognized sexual vagaries.”
Interested by artwork, he enlisted the recommendation of a high-school pal, the Ashcan Faculty painter William Glackens, and in 1912 despatched Glackens to Paris with a want checklist and $20,000 (about $650,000 in the present day). Discovering that the Impressionists Barnes sought had been costlier than anticipated, Glackens skewed fashionable. In the midst of two weeks, he purchased 33 works, together with a Picasso, a Cézanne, and the primary Van Gogh to enter an American assortment, his spellbinding The Postman. When Barnes made his personal journey to Paris just a few months later, he spent thrice the cash in half the time and lived as much as each stereotype the French had about American millionaires. “He did actually wave his chequebook within the air,” Gertrude Stein wrote to a pal.
By Neil L. Rudenstine
Modernism held attraction for somebody who thought-about himself a pugnaciously unique thinker. Gathering outdated artwork was posh and respectable, however in an America nonetheless scandalized by the sight of breasts, amassing fashionable artwork was outrageous. Inside 10 years, Barnes had acquired some 700 work. However artwork to him was greater than a proxy for cultural sophistication and a fats checking account. It made him really feel issues—intense and essential issues—and he would spend the remainder of his life making an attempt to map exactly the way it did so.
If his obsession with Renoir’s late, big-bottomed, pinheaded nudes appears “idiosyncratic within the excessive,” as Rudenstine writes, it was shared by Picasso and Matisse, who prized radical departures in type. Barnes was a turbulent particular person and Renoir was his blissful place, filled with fairly colours and prepared flesh. Cézanne appealed for various causes. Barnes discovered heroism within the artist’s “social strangeness,” and noticed it mirrored within the artwork: “His deformations of naturalistic appearances are akin to the brusque remarks … which, when sociability is the rule, venture new interpretations upon conventionally accepted concepts.”
Barnes’s eye wasn’t good—he handed on Van Gogh’s Starry Night time—however his instincts had been remarkably good. He started shopping for African sculpture in 1922 and amassed an essential assortment. He purchased outdated masters whose agitation or distortions recalled the moderns he cherished. He purchased Egyptian and Greco-Roman antiquities. He purchased Native American serapes and jewellery. He purchased American folks artwork and—repudiating the excellence between “artwork” and “craft”—acquired portions of handwrought hinges, keyhole plates, and door titties, which he hung alongside the work. To Kenneth Clark, then the top of the Nationwide Gallery in London, he wrote that he noticed “no important esthetic distinction between the types of the good painters or sculptors, and people of the iron-workers.”
None of this was fairly as extraordinary as Barnes appreciated to fake. The connection amongst folks artwork, handcrafts, and modernism was made by plenty of curators and collectors on the time. Regarding the avant-garde, John Quinn, the visionary behind the 1913 Armory Present, was extra adventurous, leaning into Cubism and Duchamp’s radical experiments the place Barnes balked. (Their rivalry was such that Barnes, tiring of his common name-calling, employed non-public detectives to dig up filth on Quinn.) Others weren’t far behind. MoMA’s 2024 e-book Inventing the Fashionable celebrates the museum’s feminine founders—Abby Aldrich Rockefeller, Lillie P. Bliss, and Mary Quinn Sullivan—and the energetic idealism required to get these efforts off the bottom in an usually hostile tradition.
Barnes exaggerated his temerity within the face of philistines partly as a result of he longed to be acknowledged as greater than only a world-class shopper. Making use of his chemist’s mind to finding the “scientific” ideas behind his aesthetic expertise, he concluded that what mattered in artwork was type—line, shade, house, motion. Contextual information akin to biographies and subject material simply distracted from the actual act of trying. These formalist concepts had been articulated by numerous critics and artwork historians earlier than Barnes, although, as common, he took them to extremes. His 530-page “assertion of ideas,” The Artwork in Portray (1925), consists of no titles for works reproduced within the e-book, lest readers be led astray by subject material.
Rather more unique was his utility of this formalism to John Dewey’s theories of experimental training and social reform. He might cite Dewey’s 1916 e-book Democracy and Schooling “virtually chapter and verse,” Gopnik tells us. Barnes was satisfied that “plain folks of common intelligence” may very well be dropped at the form of artwork apotheosis he had skilled, simply by understanding easy methods to look. He derided artwork historical past as a self-discipline and artwork students individually, however he couldn’t abandon the concept he himself had experience different folks wanted.
Like many individuals who get loads out of trying, Barnes was aggravated on the informal attitudes of museum guests. When the Barnes Basis opened its doorways in 1925—in a purpose-built neoclassical constructing inside a 12-acre arboretum adjoining to Barnes’s residence—its indenture permitted no posh events and no unvetted guests. The artwork wouldn’t journey or be reproduced in shade. To see it, you utilized to take lessons within the Barnes technique. It was not a museum; it was a college.
Inside, he organized (and usually rearranged) the gathering in “ensembles” that combined objects of various ages, origins, and features. Most individuals do that at residence, however Barnes’s stridently symmetrical preparations—massive artworks within the center, smaller ones to both facet, formal echoes bouncing across the room—had been emphatically pedagogical. In Room 15, for instance, Matisse’s Purple Madras Headdress (1907) is flanked by (amongst different issues) a pair of watery landscapes, a pair of followers, a pair of soup ladles, and a pair of images, every displaying a girl and a canine (certainly one of them from the hand of William Glackens’s daughter, age 9). The impact is of an art-history curriculum designed by Wes Anderson.
Admission was doled out on the idea of whim and choler. Having prior experience or spectacular connections was normally a black mark: T. S. Eliot, Le Corbusier, Barnett Newman, and the heads of each MoMA and the Whitney had been among the many rejected. Pupil conduct was monitored. Questioning the strategy or viewing within the improper means might get you bounced. Rumor was that Barnes and his second in command, Violette de Mazia, lurked incognito or listened by microphones for heretical dialog. Such ritualistic protocols can really improve the expertise of viewing: Perceiving the specialness of the chance, folks will give heightened consideration. So whereas some Barnes college students rebelled, others turned acolytes.
Dewey, certainly one of Barnes’s only a few lasting pals, wrote in his e-book Artwork as Expertise that the academic work of the gathering was of “a pioneer high quality corresponding to the very best that has been achieved in any discipline through the current era, that of science not excepted.” Contemplating that the science of that era had produced antibiotics and the speculation of relativity, that’s fairly a declare.
Fifty-three and childless when the inspiration opened its doorways, Barnes was not oblivious to the necessity to organize its future past his lifetime. However his imaginative and prescient for it was rigid. He unsuccessfully floated potential partnerships to the College of Pennsylvania, Haverford Faculty, and Sarah Lawrence Faculty, whose exasperated president lastly wrote: “You’ll be able to stuff your cash, your photos, your iron work, your antiques, and the entire goddamn factor proper up the Schuylkill River.” Barnes then educated an affectionate eye on close by Lincoln College—the second-oldest traditionally Black college within the nation, alma mater of Langston Hughes and Thurgood Marshall.
His relationship with Black tradition and Black leaders was characteristically complicated. He thought-about spirituals “America’s solely nice music,” and his admiration for African sculpture was deep. However this appreciation was usually tinged with condescension. The one Black painter in his assortment was not a type of artists who had been to Paris and absorbed the teachings of modernism, however the self-taught “primitive” Horace Pippin. (Equally, the ladies in his assortment tended towards the doe-eyed and ornamental. He returned the Georgia O’Keeffes he’d purchased, however stored his Marie Laurencins.)
Nonetheless, he cast a relationship with Lincoln’s president, Horace Mann Bond, and in October 1950 altered the phrases of succession in order that Lincoln would finally assume management of the inspiration’s board. This relationship, too, would possibly nicely have gone south, however in July 1951 Barnes sped by a cease check in his Packard convertible and collided with a tractor trailer.
For the following 37 years, Violette de Mazia carried the Barnes torch and guarded the Barnes gates. Admission turned tougher, the dogma stricter, the scholars fewer however extra ardent. When the state pressured the tax-exempt basis to open to the general public two days every week, Barnes college students picketed. In 1987, the thinker and artwork critic Arthur C. Danto described the sorry state of affairs—the “gorgeous works” imprisoned in “the sullen museum, with its musty smells and emotionless custodians.”
De Mazia’s loss of life, in 1988, snapped the inspiration out of its torpor. That it had been careening towards insolvency now turned clear, and the one paths to earnings—admission charges, mortgage reveals, occasion leases—had been blocked by Barnes’s indenture. The brand new Lincoln-appointed board fought to interrupt the phrases; former Barnes college students fought to protect them. The state fought to extend entry; neighbors fought to limit it. Accusations of racism and corruption bounced round. Ultimately the board proposed transferring the entire assortment to a brand new location close to the Philadelphia Museum of Artwork. YouTube feedback beneath the 2009 anti-move movie The Artwork of the Steal convey the ensuing outrage: “My soul cries for this loss,” “Disgrace!!!,” “I Actually hope The Philadelphia Of Artwork [sic] Burns to the bottom … artwork and all.” If this fury appears disproportionate to the state of affairs—a nonprofit establishment in want of funds finds a approach to protect its core belongings whereas growing public entry—it was definitely very Barnesian.
The Barnes Basis has now been on Philadelphia’s Museum Mile for greater than a decade. The artwork is all there—Cézanne’s nice The Card Gamers, the various pink girls in the hunt for their garments, the Wes Anderson ensembles. From ceiling vaults to baseboards, each room has been replicated because it appeared when Barnes died. However they sit in a unique constructing, below a unique algorithm.
Entry is not an achievement on par with getting previous the bouncer at Berghain. All you need to do is cough up $30. Inside, you may interrupt your viewing with a cup of espresso within the café or a go to to the reward store, the place you should purchase a Van Gogh Postman mug or socks adorned with Horace Pippin’s African American household at prayer (an odd selection for footwear, however perhaps the logical consequence of pure formalist thought—the colours and shapes look high quality on an ankle).
In different phrases, exterior the re-created rooms, you get the usual, bustling, consumer-oriented museum expertise, not arboreal serenity, and contained in the rooms, you need to put up with the presence of different folks, not all of them fashions of rectitude. However there may be nothing prefer it. The absence of wall texts generally is a welcome reduction from present museum observe. And if the ensembles rely extra on visible rhyming than on concepts, they actually do get you to look. If you’d like, you may even take lessons within the Barnes technique, with out spending some capricious check of advantage.
Arthur Danto was proper, although: Barnes continues to be remembered “for the spectacular assortment of early fashionable artwork that bears his title, for the keenness with which he stored folks from viewing it and for the horrible mood he expended on behalf of those two initiatives. He was a gifted however an especially tiresome man.” Barnes’s apparent intelligence, Gopnik observes, is “overshadowed, even eclipsed, by his actual emotional and social stupidity.”
And but, there’s something gripping about his battle, 12 months after 12 months, to resolve the riddle of artwork. By all accounts, Barnes was a person with no principle of thoughts: Missing any perception into the subjective worlds of different folks, he discovered their conduct relentlessly inexplicable and infuriating. It should have been exhausting. In an essay quickly after he began amassing, he wrote: “Good work are extra satisfying companions than the very best of books and infinitely extra so than most very good folks.”
In artwork, he believed he noticed the subjective expertise of others—Renoir, El Greco, a Fang craftsperson—made concrete and visual, even measurable. It sat nonetheless for examination. His arguments circle endlessly (Rudenstine rightly calls them tautological), in search of the mechanism whereby this subjectivity was transferred from one particular person to a different by way of type. Every murals, he wrote, “information a discovery and that discovery will be verified, the artist’s expertise will be shared, [but] solely by one who has himself realized to see.”
Like mercury, nevertheless, the target mechanism he searched for this intuitive course of at all times wriggled away from his contact. Have a look at Cézanne’s The Card Gamers or Renoir’s Henriot Household and also you see shifting edges, unstable areas, fragmentation, dissolution, impermanence. However in life, Rudenstine observes, Barnes discovered “ambiguity, irresolution, incompletion, obscurity … unattainable for him to tolerate.” His have to lock issues down almost killed the inspiration that was his nice life’s work. The tragedy of Barnes was that the issues he might perceive least held the important thing to what he cherished most.
This text seems within the April 2025 print version with the headline “The Cranky Visionary.”
While you purchase a e-book utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
